UK National ID Card Pilot SchemeThe Home Secretary David Blunkett plans ID cards to be tested in 'a small market town' later this year. According to the tender document for "pilot trial biometric enrolment" recorded in the TED supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union the trials aims are to
The Guardian says, "The Home Office confirmed last night that a six-month trial, testing the use of new generation fingerprint and eye-scanning technology, would be completed by April to "assess customer perceptions and reactions" and estimate costs. It is believed that the trial will be carried out in an as yet unnamed small market town with a population of about 10,000. While there are undoubtedly advantages in the introduction of a National ID card scheme for the smooth running and efficiency of governmental services and for our collective security, there are serious implications for individual liberties. A couple of civil rights links which focus on ID cards are Privacy International - UK National ID Cards, No2id.com, STAND and of course Liberty. This collection of links about ID cards has some good jumping off points too. Posted by Paul at August 27, 2003 03:28 AM |
Visitor Feedback
We have passports which cost a fortune already. If you introduce a national id card this should also double as a passport. This would reduce the cost to the British public by doing away with the requirement to have a passport in order to travel. Further, the card should not be available to illegal immigrants and financial migrants who are already issued with an arc card bearing their fingerprint details, names and registration details. It should be made harder for these free loaders to make their way across the free countries of Europe, where they could reasonably seek asylum, just to come here to live off our grossly unfair benefits system. My wife is 45% disabled and cannot get a penny, despite our national insurance payments. The so called asylum seekers get every thing they want having never paid a penny. Also my neighbour gets around £1000 every four weeks in benefits, he claims to have a medical condition that prevants him doing any form of work, but has just renovated his house and garden at our expense. He had a little help from friends, but if he can carry a sack of gravel he can work in the community. He dives an XR3i, where is the justice in this country Further more, why do immigration officers have to offer asylum to individuals who do not request it? Britains benefits and working rules need to brought into line with France before you contemplate a national card system which can bring no benefit to the hard working British people. Posted by: Mike Macmillan at September 21, 2003 08:26 PM |